College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

SIU accused of copying plagiarism policy

By Wendy Weinhold

Print this article

Published: Thursday, January 29, 2009

Updated: Thursday, January 29, 2009

Plagiarism

Pablo Tobon ~ Daily Egyptian

SIU plagiarism policy


SIU plagiarism guidelines


Indiana University plagiarism policy


Case Western plagiarism policy


Members of a committee formed in response to plagiarism accusations levied against a former university administrator received word this week that they need to reconvene and examine documents they may have plagiarized.


According to The Chronicle of Higher Education, the 10-member committee of Southern Illinois University academics and administrators commissioned to develop a plagiarism policy may have borrowed from Indiana University’s definition—without citing IU.


SIU officials seemed surprised by the news and stressed the policy was still in draft form.
It would be a near perfect example of irony: a definition of plagiarism created in the wake of plagiarism scandals may itself have been plagiarized.


Both policies open with similar sentences.


“Plagiarism is defined as presenting existing work as one’s own,” the SIU definition reads.


“Plagiarism is defined as presenting someone else’s work, including the work of other students, as one’s own,” the IU definition begins.


SIU’s 139-word definition is nearly identical to the definition IU adopted in 2005 and currently publishes on its Web site under the heading, “How to recognize plagiarism.”


According to the Chronicle, the committee’s chairman, Arthur M. “Lain” Adkins, did not know how the mishap occurred. He confirmed the language in the two reports was “very similar,” but told the Chronicle he did not believe that meant his committee had engaged in wrongdoing.


“It could be a coincidence,” Adkins told the Chronicle. “Any definition by nature is going to be close to another definition.”


Adkins, who serves as director of the University Press, told the Chronicle that R. Gerald Nelms, a recognized plagiarism expert and associate professor of English at SIUC, “most likely” wrote SIU’s version. Nelms told the Chronicle he suspected any similarities were “coincidental.”


Nelms said he was not sure if he was responsible for the similar wording.


Committee member Liz DiLalla, an SIUC professor of behavioral social science, said she was shocked and surprised to learn of the magazine’s report. She described the news as “bizarre.”


“I assume we will be hashing this out very soon,” DiLalla said.


DiLalla said no date has been set for the committee to meet.


The committee was organized in December 2006 after plagiarism allegations surfaced against former chancellor Walter Wendler.


The committee deliberated for approximately 10 months before releasing its 17-page report. The report was made public the same day in October 2007 that a panel first convened to investigate accusations of plagiarism against SIU President Glenn Poshard.


It makes sense for SIU and IU’s policies to be similar, said SIUC speech communications professor Lenore Langsdorf, who was a member of the seven-person panel that ultimately found Poshard guilty of inadvertent plagiarism. Langsdorf said the more uniformity in the definition of plagiarism across institutions, the better, and the less likely people are to be confused about what amounts to plagiarism.


But the committee that wrote SIU’s plagiarism definition should have attributed its source, she said.


“Why reinvent the wheel?” Langsdorf said. “You borrow it, and then you cite it, and that’s totally legitimate as far as I’m concerned.”


A reporter from The Chronicle of Higher Education called administrators Tuesday, university spokesman David Gross said.


On Wednesday, the magazine reported on the similarities in the plagiarism policies of Indiana University and SIU.


After the story was published, the committee members received an e-mail from Adkins, who said they would need to meet soon, DiLalla said.


Gross emphasized that the committee’s plagiarism definition was a draft. He acknowledged the definitions are very similar and said the two university’s definitions are “broad-based, commonly used definitions of plagiarism.”


“Our lawyers will argue there’s no institutional right or copyright to this term,” Gross said.“The issue of whether the term can be plagiarized is at point. There’s no author, no publisher.”


Chancellor Samuel Goldman did not return a phone message left at his home Thursday night. Officials at IU could not be reached for comment.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

jane
Fri Mar 27 2009 23:15
What? Where did GMU copy University of Seattle?
welby
Fri Feb 6 2009 14:33
Not surprising. GMU copied parts of the fiscal responsibility wording from the University of Seattle. They're not similar, they're identical.
GC
Thu Feb 5 2009 00:42
"Maybe they should be tested, before being able to be a writer. "

Most of the testing should, focus on comma splices.

Caitlin
Wed Feb 4 2009 19:09
Plagiarism making a national laughingstock out of SIUC, being reported by the college paper that made a national laughingstock out of SIUC, courtesy of one Kodee Kennings.

The newspaper couldn't pick up a phone and call the Army to see if a Sgt. Dan Kennings existed, so I'll wait to pass judgment on this issue until the rest of the story is revealed by another newspaper.

Civil Saluki
Tue Feb 3 2009 19:54
Seriously, this is getting silly. A definition that appears to be similar? Shouldn't two academic institutions have similar definitions to something this serious? This reminds me of a professor in the engineering department that threw a fit in class and demanded confessions from us for cheating on assignments. His evidence was that we followed all the same steps in the solution and all chose the same variables. Shocking. We had to remind him that his textbook that he "required" us to purchase had the same problem with the same solution and the same variable. Duh!
fastsaluki
Tue Feb 3 2009 13:38
SIU Psychology Student

Have you considered getting counciling?

PO Alumni
Tue Feb 3 2009 08:03
And people wonder why Alumni don't donate to the school?
SIU Student
Mon Feb 2 2009 22:28
Slingbox,

Obviously, we can't get past the DE breaking the story. "SIUC, is committed to being a trusted source of information"...All lies. The DE needs to re-evaluate the reporters, In the article, grammar, and confusion every where. Maybe they should be tested, before being able to be a writer.

Slingbox
Mon Feb 2 2009 22:18
Can people get past the element of the DE supposedly breaking the story? The Chronicle of Higher Education, which most assuredly is a trusted publication, broke this one. What incentive do they have for a witchunt?
SIU Psychology Student
Mon Feb 2 2009 21:37
Here we go again, we are all heckling Dr. Scales about the alleged accusation. However, as a student this is more important, and if the DE actually wrote more articles on the "important" things that went on around this campus, then maybe they will gain more credit. (Maybe Not) Or, maybe they are to ignorant and incompetent to even find out what is actually important. If we can talk about some one who lied, wouldn't you think this is more severe. I mean for crying out loud, SIU COPIED another schools plagiarism policy. Yet, we are making a big deal out of this military crap...Also, as Dr. Gitau stated, we hired Dr.Scales based on his Professional record, receiving Master degrees and a PhD in Psychology..Not on his military record..Besides, he is "TENURE" and also, he will get paid regardless. DE, You guys are preposterous, and a disgrace to this campus.
Guy
Mon Feb 2 2009 15:42
I'd like to see any other way to define plagiarism than through these terms. Honestly.
Your name
Mon Feb 2 2009 10:56
ha ha ha This is the funniest headline I have read in a while. Someone should send it into Leno.
your name
Sun Feb 1 2009 23:40
I think it's a funny story. Try reading it out loud.
Ken
Sun Feb 1 2009 23:10
Michael,
This was ridiculous as soon as the DE published ANOTHER plagiarism story. I mean for crying out loud any twit with half a brain knows that DE gets their undies in a bind so tight they can't think like a normal human being when the word plagiarism is mentioned.
Michael Raso
Sun Feb 1 2009 19:37
This is getting absolutely ridiculous.
Eric D.
Sun Feb 1 2009 13:56
Ok, Alan, I will take that comment to mean "I can't do it." That's especially compelling from someone who can bandy about a word like "Sisyphean"! Who else would like to give it a try?
Alan
Sun Feb 1 2009 13:31
Thanks to Eric D. for weighing in. Bold, but quite evidently clueless, challenges like his add to our sense, cemented already by comments from members of the Plagiarism Committee, that fighting plagiarism is indeed a Sisyphean task.
Eric D.
Sun Feb 1 2009 09:10
SInce 1) the question is "how does a University clearly and succinctly define plagiarism, and 2) the answer IU uses is "Plagiarism is defined as presenting existing work as one’s own," and 3) that is pretty much the definition, I would like to ask those of you posting to come up with an alternative that is equally clear and simple but does not use the words "plagiarism is defined as," "existing work," or "one's own." Remember too that if you simply shuffle the word order or substitute one word for another (for instance, "using" for "presenting"), you will still be guilty of plagiarism. Once we have a good definition, we can give it to the committee and end the controversy. I look forward to reading your entries!
Ken
Sun Feb 1 2009 01:24
This horse is DEAD. It was beaten, killed, chopped up, made into glue, used to make macaroni cards in grade school, taken home, hung on the fridge, thrown out, taken to the land fill, and is decomposing into methane.

What is it when the DE hears the "P" word, they lose circulation to vital organs and start getting dizzy.

gbn
Sat Jan 31 2009 18:18
What is really lame is the fact that you first plagiarize and then go on to justify it.

“Why reinvent the wheel?” Langsdorf said. “You borrow it, and then you cite it, and that’s totally legitimate as far as I’m concerned.”

I am 5000 miles away and this issue about plagiarism that started couple of years ago is still haunting us alumni. I dont think I will recommend this school for my juniors.

Brian, I am afraid you will never have a chance to put those degrees back up on the wall. You will be 'glad' to know that these are the people who have fired colleagues, students (I've known personally) for the same reason - plagiarism

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In