College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

BOT to hear 9.9 percent tuition hike proposal

By Brian Feldt

Print this article

Published: Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Updated: Tuesday, March 24, 2009

The SIU Board of Trustees will consider a proposal next week that could increase tuition rates by 9.9 percent, university spokesman Rod Sievers confirmed Tuesday.


Under the proposal, an incoming freshman would pay $3,832.50 per semester, up $345 from last year’s freshmen class rate.


“Technically it’s an increase in tuition,” Sievers said. “But tuition for all other students (excluding incoming freshmen) will stay the same.”


State law requires a student’s tuition be locked for four years, meaning only new students would pay the hiked rate.


The board will hear the proposal during its April 2 meeting and will vote on the increase during its May 7 meeting.


The board will also discuss raising student fees. According to the board’s Web site, student fees would increase by $141 per semester to $1,560.


Sievers said he expects the tuition increase to drop — somewhere around the 4.5 percent range, he said — before it is proposed.


“It’s a complicated process, but I don’t think it was necessary to go that high,” Sievers said. “They have to figure out what enrollment is going to be, how much state appropriations are going to be given. They are looking to change that with an eye on dropping that number.”


The rate SIUC administrators end up proposing, he said, depends on the state’s budget and how much money the university is allocated. Sievers said he expects to know more later this week. Gov. Pat Quinn released a budget proposal last week that would give the university $236 million from the state, roughly $2.3 million more than SIU received last year.


Tuition has increased every year since 1995 and has increased for first-year students every year since 2004, according to university records. Last year, incoming freshmen also faced a 9.9 percent spike. The year before, incoming students faced a 9.3 percent increase.


The board’s SIUC student trustee Nate Brown, who was chosen in a special election March 5, said after his election that tuition and fee increases would likely be inevitable.


Brown, a second-year law student from Chester, said Tuesday that his job as student trustee would be more about informing students than making tough decisions.


“A lot of my job is information-gathering,” Brown said. “If we can get out and talk to students and say this is how much they want to raise our tuition and fees by and this is what they are going to do with it, it will give people a better understanding of what problems the university is confronting and, in some sense, hope they come to the conclusion that they have to take action.”


Brown said he plans on meeting with Chancellor Sam Goldman Friday to discuss exactly where the money from tuition and fees would be spent.


Brown said nobody enjoys raising tuition or fees.


“It’s not as if the university has this big pot of money and you just keep putting in and we can just take that money out and move books from the library or provide scholarships,” he said. “Everything neatly fits into a certain budget.


“Every tuition dollar is spoken for, though.”

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

20 comments Log in to Comment

Crabapple
Thu Mar 26 2009 01:32
Factor, I'm not an apologist for anyone. You want to call out the administration on tuition or Saluki Way, be my guest. I'm 100 % in agreement on that. Just don't smear character. That's not cool.

I don't like the tuition increases one bit. However, how the hell do you steal papers that are free, especially if you only take the papers to other people in an office? We're talking about 10 free DE's here. If the DE didn't blow that out of proportion, no one would give a crap. If you want to call out someone for not representing the students, fine. Just don't twist facts.

Factor
Thu Mar 26 2009 00:19
Crabapple: His name came up because he was quoted in his article. What does my running against him have to do with him being a thief and a liar? I did not hear similar comments when Blaggo was was around. I mean how juvenille can you be, Run against him and see how you can do. I mean really grow up. I know you are an apologist for him and why is your version any more credible than mine. Oh that's right, you were there and saw him steal the papers. As to why he quit, he was chased out because he was so ineffective and had some character issues.
Ron
Wed Mar 25 2009 22:35
Ken,
Thanks for the props, but there's really not that much hope for me. Do a lot of our tax dollars get wasted? Abso-freakin-lutely. Does the managers at AIG getting bonuses while (to quote singer John Rich) they're "shuttin' Detroit down" piss me off? Absolutely. But I support the stimulus package, just like I support spending initatives at SIU provided that they serve a purpose.
But I've managed businesses, and I know -- like anyone with common sense -- that you'll fail if you spend more than you make. SIUC needs to cut a few administrator positions, fund Saluki Way AND our library, cut or lock fees and actively recruit new students.
Crabapple
Wed Mar 25 2009 21:20
Factor, your story about the resignation of Nate was short in facts. Nate resigned as VP of USG when he realized that it was an ineffective organization, and even trying to reform it internally as President later on, was when the paper joke happened. I was there, I saw it, he took 10 papers from a rack and put them on a table in the office. If you're going to comment, please get your facts straight.

I have great concerns about both increasing tuition and Saluki Way. However they're separate issues and you don't have to reach for straws or attack people to put forward an opposing perspective. In fact, I question why Nate's name was brought up in this debate in the first place. If you feel you can do better, run against him the next election, let's see how well you do.

Factor
Wed Mar 25 2009 20:16
It may have had to happen. Of course it happened due to a lack of keeping up with repairs of the facility. That having been said, the claim that its supporters have made have no basis in fact.
1) It will increase attendance.
2) It will bring millions of dollars in extra sales to the community.
3) It will create more jobs as the employers will become so impressed with SIUC, they will begin hiring SIUC students when they normally would not give them a second look.
Ken
Wed Mar 25 2009 20:06
Factor,
Saluki way HAD to happen. The Stadium was crumbling.... litterally.
So other buildings are in bad shape too.
Somebody was going to have to pay for it... better the local community and the students than people in Utah and the rest of the state that have nothing to do with SIU.
Factor
Wed Mar 25 2009 19:54
To SIU Grad 06: You are lying and no doubt a supporter of Brown and Saluki Way. The fact that you were on GPSC means that you are perhaps an Ed Ford Wannabe. It was a front page story in the DE and ultimately help Brown be forced to resign. It was a lot more than 10 papers and the only joke was Nate Brown.
Factor
Wed Mar 25 2009 19:51
"You have to spend money to make this campus better in the long run. You may not see the benefits now but when your resume says SIU or the diploma on your wall with SIU... it will help!

Suck it up... Saluki Way is happening whether you like it or not!

Go Nate Brown! "
So Improving, you are claiming at because SIUC has a new football stadium, it is going to help get SIUC grads jobs, are you saying that because Glenn told you to or do you have any empirical data to back up your argument?

Your name
Wed Mar 25 2009 19:21
That it, keep hiking up tuition and student fees year after year and squander it, then act surprised when enrollment continues to decline. Saluki way is just a sink hole for money and will do little improve SIU's appeal. The only people choosing colleges by their sports teams are players, for everyone else it's just a dumb thing to do.

"Suck it up... Saluki Way is happening whether you like it or not!"

It maybe happening, but people do not have to suck it up. I am looking at going to Western Illinois or SEMO (who is offering instate tuition to people Illinois etc) and at least there administrations haven't been made to look like bumbling idiots in the national news.

Ken
Wed Mar 25 2009 16:11
Ron,
I'm shocked. You're comment sounds.... conservative in nature. If I get this straight you're talking about a cause and effect market based solution to SIU's problems. Replace the word "tuition" with "taxes" and the word "SIU" with "our governement" and I think you've got it nailed.
Ron there is still hope for you after all.
SIU Grad '06
Wed Mar 25 2009 14:51
I was in GPSC in the Fall of 2004 (isn't this 2009), and I was around when this happened. Nate took 10 newspapers (free newspapers mind you with a circulation of 20,000) as a joke, and I don't think he wasn't even named in the story about voter registration. Not really the villain you depict.
Jim Davies
Wed Mar 25 2009 14:47
Some of you people need to do some homework. Not one penny of the tuition increase will go to Saluki Way. C'mon...do some research, become informed. There IS a student fee that goes to athletics and yes, it is going up. But not one penny of your tuition dollars goes to Saluki Way. And by the way, if you are already a student here, your tuition will not go up. Please, check it out and report back here.
Improving SIU
Wed Mar 25 2009 14:35
You have to spend money to make this campus better in the long run. You may not see the benefits now but when your resume says SIU or the diploma on your wall with SIU... it will help!

Suck it up... Saluki Way is happening whether you like it or not!

Go Nate Brown!

Factor
Wed Mar 25 2009 12:18
When Nate Brown speaks, beware. He is a huge supporter of Saluki Way and gave a hysterical speech in front of the Carbondale City Council asking for the city council to raise your taxes to fund Saluki Way. He is the same Nate Brown who stole every DE he could find when they wrote a critical article about him when he was in USGA. He is already running for reelection for his job. Trust me he supports tuition increases because Glenn will tell him to.
fastsaluki
Wed Mar 25 2009 10:21
Hmmm. That works out to about a grand a month for a Freshman to attend classes taught primarily in mass lecture settings or by TAs. Kind of puts SIU and it's "game" in perspective. Add in books, room and board, and a few other incidentals and then ask the question, "Is this a reasonable value"?
watcher
Wed Mar 25 2009 10:08
I would like to know what percentage of this increase will be used for saluki way?? Funny to me there needing donations to complete the wasteful project and seems this is one way to get some funds for it. I also question the roofing of the dunn richmond center with fees charged students, while it is a small business incubator, that holds no classes for students that i know of...seems they do what they want and when they want...
watcher
Wed Mar 25 2009 10:07
I would like to know what percentage of this increase will be used for saluki way?? Funny to me there needing donations to complete the wasteful project and seems this is one way to get some funds for it. I also question the roofing of the dunn richmond center with fees charged students, while it is a small business incubator, that holds no classes for students that i know of...seems they do what they want and when they want...
Nate Brown
Wed Mar 25 2009 09:52
Ron, I agree with you. There are at least three ways to avoid tuition and fee increases: 1. Cutting programs and services; 2. Attracting more students; 3. Holding the line on tuition and fees and making the University determine how to deal with less money. Would students rather have fewer services than pay $141 more each semester? Maybe. Would any services have to be cut if we don't raise fees? Maybe not. These are all questions that I have to figure out over the next month before we vote in May.

Contrary to what you read, I am not resigned to the idea that tuition and fees have to go up. They aren't inevitable, but our University provides a certain quality of education, and we need to ensure that we can continue to provide that quality of education and experience. One item that I am particularly concerned with is the proposals for ISU, SEMO, Murray, and U of I. We have to continue to be competitive with our surrounding schools--both in affordability and quality of experience.

I am meeting with USG and GPSC in the coming weeks to discuss why they took the stances on the proposals as they did. I will also be working to get proposals out to the larger student body during the month of April.

I encourage you to contact the Board. The April Meeting is in Edwardsville; however, when the tuition and fees are voted on, the meeting will be in Carbondale (May 7). I encourage you to attend and address the Board during public comments. Further, you can reach me at nobrown@siu.edu. I need to hear from you.

siu family
Wed Mar 25 2009 09:09
We use to go to bot meetings and protest the increase in fees with signs and speakers. The end result was a blind ear and eye and a condescending attitude that we just didn't understand what the university needs. The reality of the situation is that the bot just doesn't care, after all they are not going to pay the increase in fees (well except for Nate Brown who is a sell out and believes all the bs) and I remember at one meeting an administrator saying that the increase would amount to a night out at Applebees. They just don't really get it, we don't have the money, don't want to borrow anymore.
Ron Fields
Wed Mar 25 2009 07:19
If a grocery store is going out of business, the last thing they need to do is raise prices. What they do is cut prices, improve quality, and let the people know about the changes. If SIUC told all incoming students that their fees would NEVER INCREASE (locked fees, like locked tuition, on a year-by-year basis) that type of security would go a long way towards increasing enrollment.
The bottom line is this: if students are sick of paying more fees and more tuition, we need to do something about it. Call the board of trustees at 618-536-3357 and let them know how increasing fees are impacting you.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In